|
Restore-Digest Wednesday, July
10 2002 Volume 2002 : Number 129
Today's Restore Hemp News DC:
Marijuana Advocates Submit Signatures
UK: Cannabis Ban Faces Investigation UK: Tories Attack Cannabis Pilot WI: Pols Must Not Be Silent On Drug War DC: Medical Pot May Again Go To Voters NV: Petition To Ease Nevada's Marijuana Laws Under Review DPFCA: SF: July 10th MMJ Rally DC: Washington Won't Give Up On Medical Marijuana UK: Britain To Go Easy On Pot Use Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:14:43 -0700 Subject:DC: Marijuana Advocates Submit Signatures Up TOC Newshawk: Krissy www.mpp.org Pubdate: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 Source: Washington Post (DC) Webpage: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41844-2002Jul8.html Section: Metro, In Brief, The District Copyright: 2002 The Washington Post Company Contact: letters@washpost.com Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/491 Author:Avram Goldstein, Justin Blum, Yolanda Woodlee, Debbi Wilgoren and Ylan Q. Mui, the Associated Press and Reuters Cited: Marijuana Policy Project (www.mpp.org) MARIJUANA ADVOCATES SUBMIT SIGNATURES Proponents of the Medical Marijuana Initiative yesterday submitted what they said were about 40,000 petition signatures to the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, the first step toward getting the issue on the ballot in the November election. Approval of the ballot initiative would allow doctors to give patients permission to grow and use marijuana for medicinal purposes. There will be a 10-day period during which opponents can challenge signatures on the petition. D.C. voters approved a similar measure in 1998, but Rep. Robert L. Barr Jr. (R-Ga.) introduced an amendment in Congress to block its implementation. In March, a federal court struck down Barr's amendment, but the Bush administration plans to appeal the decision. The Marijuana Policy Project, based in the District, estimates that more than 1,000 patients with HIV, glaucoma, cancer and other medical problems would benefit from legalized marijuana use. Nine states have legalized marijuana for medical purposes. __________________________________________________________________________ Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth ** web: http://www.crrh.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:15:06 -0700 Subject:UK: Cannabis Ban Faces Investigation Up TOC Newshawk: JimmyG Pubdate: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 Source: BBC News (UK Web) Webpage: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk_politics/newsid_1456000/1456497.stm Copyright: 2002 BBC Contact: http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/talking_point/forum/ Website: http://news.bbc.co.uk/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/558 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?207 (Cannabis - United Kingdom) CANNABIS BAN FACES INVESTIGATION A House of Commons committee is to investigate the possible decriminalisation of cannabis. In its first major inquiry of the new parliament, the powerful home affairs committee will also question whether current drug rules work. Witnesses include key government figures such as the Lord Chancellor. Lord Irvine of Lairg. and Home Secretary David Blunkett. It comes against a growing background of opposition to the banning of marijuana from politicians of all sides and national newspapers. The committee will look at the effect of liberalisation on the availability and demand for drugs. It will also study the effect of relaxing restrictions on drug-related deaths and crime. Practical The committee, which will meet in October, will also examine whether decriminalisation is desirable and if not, discuss "practical alternatives". The move comes amid growing backbench calls, including from former Tory Cabinet minister Peter Lilley, for the liberalisation of laws on marijuana. The new committee will look at the effectiveness of the 10 year national strategy on drug misuse and take into account the Police Foundation's report on drugs which was chaired by Dame Ruth Runciman. Its chairman is former junior minister Chris Mullin who left the government of his own accord after the election because he wanted to return to chairing the committee. The issue arose earlier this month when former Tory deputy leader Peter Lilley rocked die-hard traditionalists in the Conservative party with his call to legalise cannabis. Mr Lilley envisaged magistrates issuing licences for outlets selling cannabis to over-18s. Downing Street has firmly resisted any liberalisation of the drugs laws, although Mr Blunkett has said there should be an "adult, intelligent" debate on the issue. Impetus Leading charity DrugScope welcomed the inquiry as a valuable contribution to a more open and mature debate on drugs in the UK. DrugScope director of communications Harry Shapiro said: "Last year's Police Foundation Inquiry gave the drugs debate a much-needed impetus. "We have seen evidence in recent weeks that more politicians are ready to take on this complex issue and explore the possibilities for change. "It is a subject which interests a large number of ordinary people and an open and mature debate could help re-engage many, particularly the young, in the political process." Last week, the overwhelming majority of 116 Labour MPs taking part in a poll for the BBC World at One programme supported a substantial inquiry into the drug, such as a royal commission. __________________________________________________________________________ Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. - --- MAP posted-by: Ariel ** web: http://www.crrh.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:15:50 -0700 Subject:UK: Tories Attack Cannabis Pilot Up TOC Newshawk: JimmyG Pubdate: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 Source: BBC News (UK Web) Webpage: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/england/newsid_2116000/2116975.stm Copyright: 2002 BBC Contact: http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/talking_point/forum/ Website: http://news.bbc.co.uk/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/558 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?207 (Cannabis - United Kingdom) TORIES ATTACK CANNABIS PILOT Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith will visit Brixton on Tuesday to promote his party's opposition to the "softly softly" drugs experiment in the London borough of Lambeth. Under the experiment, which was introduced a year ago by former Lambeth police commander Brian Paddick, those found carrying small amounts of cannabis are given a warning by police, rather than prosecuted. The Conservatives say the policy has handed over control to drug dealers and their gangs. The Home Secretary David Blunkett is due to announce to the Commons on Wednesday whether the government intends to downgrade the penalties for possession and dealing in cannabis. The Lambeth scheme was launched to give police more time to combat hard drugs. However, the Conservatives say there has been a significant increase overall in drug trafficking in Lambeth and drug dealers are in control, not the police. Kate Hoey, one of the local Labour MPs, has also condemned the experiment, saying it has made drug trafficking socially acceptable. Last week, Mr Paddick defended the scheme, saying there was no evidence to show his relaxed approach had attracted an influx of "drugs tourists" to Brixton. Figures from Scotland Yard last month showed street crime in Lambeth has fallen dramatically. Scotland Yard's Deputy Commissioner Ian Blair, last week said the pilot scheme was "undoubtedly" beneficial to the police. The policy of issuing police warnings might be extended to other parts of the country, if as seems likely, Mr Blunkett announces on Wednesday that the penalties for cannabis are to be downgraded. He told MPs last October there was a case for reclassification: for reducing the maximum penalty for possession of cannabis from five years to two years and for trafficking from 14 years to five years. __________________________________________________________________________ Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. - --- MAP posted-by: Ariel ** web: http://www.crrh.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:19:08 -0700 Subject:WI: Pols Must Not Be Silent On Drug War Up TOC Newshawk: Drug Policy Forum of Wisconsin www.drugsense.org/dpfwi/ Pubdate: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 Source: Capital Times, The (WI) Copyright: 2002 The Capital Times Contact: tctvoice@madison.com Website: http://www.captimes.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/73 Author: John Nichols POLS MUST NOT BE SILENT ON DRUG WAR In Great Britain, newspapers have a tradition of "campaigning." They take up causes and campaign by focusing attention on them in their news columns, editorializing and generally badgering people in power to change the status quo. Over the years, campaigns pressed by British newspapers have brought major shifts in the country's political and cultural landscape. The best of the current crop of campaigning newspapers is the Independent (www.independent.co.uk), a London-based daily that circulates nationally. The Independent's boldest and most successful campaign of recent years has been a drive to liberalize Britain's drug laws. In particular, the campaigning focused on lifting criminal penalties against the possession and use of marijuana. When the Independent's campaign began, Britain was coming out of the Margaret Thatcher/John Major era of conservative rule, in which successive British governments embraced all but the silliest American affectations. Thus, while Brits were never subjected to Nancy Reagan's "Just Say 'No' " blathering, the country continued to mete out harsh punishments to people found to be in possession of marijuana. Worst of all, politicians who knew better remained generally silent. As in the United States, where most mainstream candidates and elected officials are afraid to appear to be "soft on crime" - or even "soft on soft drugs" - British pols simply avoided discussing the absurdity of laws that applied the same criminal sanctions for possession of marijuana as it did for possession of dangerous drugs. That all changed when the Independent started campaigning for decriminalization of marijuana possession and use. The newspaper's reporters demanded that cultural, business, legal and political leaders address the issue of marijuana prohibition and, over the past few years, they have. Predictably, the first to speak up were rock and film stars, civil libertarians, and others who have long objected to a "drug war" that was lost before it began. Then came a few bold members of Parliament, most of them from the progressive wing of Tony Blair's governing Labour Party. Slowly, more Labour parliamentarians spoke. Cabinet ministers and members of the opposition Liberal Democrat and Conservative Parties decried marijuana prohibition. Police chiefs joined the chorus to point out that time wasted on pursuit of marijuana users was undermining their ability to tackle serious crime. Finally, the senior jurist sitting on Britain's highest court, the broadly respected Lord Bingham, declared the country's tough laws against marijuana possession and use to be "stupid." Asked if he supported legalization of cannabis, Lord Bingham replied, "Absolutely." The judge's answer made headline news, not just in the Independent, but in newspapers and on broadcast reports throughout the country. Even Blair felt compelled to respond, with an admission that the war on drugs has been a failure. Blair's aides quickly announced that the government plans to change the classification of marijuana so that Brits caught in possession of small amounts of the substance will no longer be subject to arrest and imprisonment. The change in Britain mirrors a dramatic rejection of drug war rhetoric and policies by European nations. Switzerland, Portugal and other countries are moving rapidly to embrace liberal approaches to marijuana like those of Holland. While most Americans are well aware that the drug war is bankrupting our states, misdirecting our police and overcrowding our courts and jails, political leaders here - with the notable exceptions of progressives such as U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin and state Rep. Mark Pocan, both Madison Democrats - remain as silent as their British peers were a few years ago. Over the next few months, The Capital Times will try to change that circumstance by borrowing a page from Britain's Independent and asking Wisconsin's candidates for governor, attorney general and other jobs to stop just saying "no" to an honest - and needed - debate about the latest failed attempt at prohibition. __________________________________________________________________________ Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. - --- MAP posted-by: Ariel ** web: http://www.crrh.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:24:19 -0700 Subject:DC: Medical Pot May Again Go To Voters Up TOC Newshawk: Krissy www.mpp.org Pubdate: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 Source: Washington Times (DC) Copyright: 2002 News World Communications, Inc. Contact: letters@washingtontimes.com Website: http://www.washingtontimes.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/492 Author: Vaishali Honawar Cited: Marijuana Policy Project (www.mpp.org) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) MEDICAL POT MAY AGAIN GO TO VOTERS D.C. voters could get another chance to vote on legalizing marijuana for medicinal uses, but congressmen who blocked the measure in 1998 are already preparing to mount a challenge. The District-based Marijuana Policy Project yesterday presented to the Board of Elections and Ethics 39,000 signatures from residents who want to bring the issue to referendum -- more than twice the number of signatures required under city law. If at least 17,500 signatures are verified, the issue will be on November's ballot. "This safely qualifies us for the referendum," said Robert Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project, a nonprofit that supports the use of medicinal marijuana for those afflicted with debilitating illnesses. "We did not want some bad guys in Congress to challenge us on this." But opposition to the bill is brewing on Capitol Hill. Rep. Bob Barr, Georgia Republican, sent a letter yesterday to Rep. Joe Knollenberg, chairman of the House Appropriations District of Columbia subcommittee, requesting that he include in the city's funding bill for 2003 an amendment that would block spending on the initiative. It was a similar amendment introduced by Mr. Barr in 1998 that prevented the initiative from going into effect, though it had passed with 69 percent of the vote. Mr. Kampia's group later challenged the amendment in federal court, which ruled this year that the amendment was unconstitutional and cleared the way for a second referendum. "The D.C. initiative is another attempt by the drug-legalization movement to move its agenda forward, to legalize marijuana under the pretext of 'medicinal' use," Mr. Barr wrote in his letter to Mr. Knollenberg, Michigan Republican. "My language is wholly appropriate and necessary, to prevent legalization of marijuana in the District of Columbia, and to prevent the use of taxpayers' monies to carry out the provisions of any such initiative." Eight states currently have laws that allow the use of marijuana as medicine: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Oregon and Washington. All states allow residents who are seriously ill to grow and use small quantities of marijuana to alleviate the pain caused by the disease or treatment. The Supreme Court ruled last year against medical necessity as a valid defense for distribution of medicinal marijuana. The decision struck down a California law that allowed groups like the Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative to distribute marijuana to patients with a doctor's approval. Advocates argue marijuana can greatly alleviate the suffering of people who have debilitating illnesses. Mr. Kampia said medicinal marijuana is particularly important to the District, which has a higher-than-average number of AIDS patients. "We do not believe sick people should be put into prison for using medical marijuana," he said. The group is lobbying Congress to stop any challenges to the referendum, Mr. Kampia said, adding that his group would not give up their effort to legalize medicinal marijuana in the District. Five of nine D.C. Council members filed affidavits in federal court this year backing the Medical Marijuana Project lawsuit: Chairman Linda W. Cropp, at-large Democrat; Sandy Allen, Ward 8 Democrat; Phil Mendelson, at-large Democrat; Kathy Patterson, Ward 3 Democrat; and Jim Graham, Ward 1 Democrat. Some council members say D.C. residents have a right to decide what they need. "The initiative is justified on its merits, but it is also a matter of home rule," said Mr. Graham, who joined a news conference organized by Mr. Kampia's group at One Judiciary Square yesterday. Mr. Graham said his support for the initiative grew out of his experience as former executive director of the D.C. chapter of the Whitman Walker Clinic for HIV/AIDS patients. "I saw for myself the specific circumstances when patients need medical marijuana. I believe doctors ought to prescribe it . I feel comfortable about that," he said. While marijuana does not cure any illnesses, studies show it can alleviate pain and help patients, Mr. Kampia said. "It allows AIDS patients to eat, and that helps them stay alive," he said. Under the initiative, people suffering from debilitating diseases could -- with a physician's prescription -- possess three mature marijuana plants, four immature marijuana plants and one ounce of usable marijuana. __________________________________________________________________________ Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. - --- MAP posted-by: Van Estes ** web: http://www.crrh.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 12:33:56 -0700 Subject:NV: Petition To Ease Nevada's Marijuana Laws Under Review Up TOC Newshawk: Krissy www.mpp.org Pubdate: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 Source: Las Vegas Sun (NV) Copyright: 2002 Las Vegas Sun, Inc Contact: letters@lasvegassun.com Website: http://www.lasvegassun.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/234 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) PETITION TO EASE NEVADA'S MARIJUANA LAWS UNDER REVIEW CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) - County clerks confirmed Monday that they received 109,048 signatures on a petition to ease Nevada's marijuana laws. But state election officials were hazy on whether the petition qualifies for the November ballot. Susan Morandi, elections deputy for Secretary of State Dean Heller, said the numbers reflect a raw count, and she must complete a sampling process to verify that Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement met minimum requirements. The sampling results are expected Tuesday. The group needs only 61,336 valid signatures to put the proposal before voters. But the total must include 10 percent of the voter turnout in the last election in at least 13 of Nevada's 17 counties. Morandi said a preliminary review shows the petition didn't get the necessary minimum in Elko and Douglas counties. That means the group can lose only two more counties and still qualify with the minimum of 13 - and Morandi said there's already some question about Nye County. The raw count shows the petition should easily qualify in the state's largest counties, Clark and Washoe. In Clark, encompassing Las Vegas, proponents needed 38,477 names and turned in more than 67,000. In Washoe, encompassing Reno, they needed 12,245 and turned in more than 26,000. But the figures were much closer in some outlying counties. Sparsely populated Esmeralda County, for example, reported a raw count of 67 compared with the 50 signatures required there. Several other counties - Mineral, Storey, Lincoln and Lander - reported only about 100 to 200 signatures above the minimums. Until last year, Nevada had the strictest marijuana law in the nation. Puffing on a single marijuana cigarette was a felony offense punishable by prison term of a year or more. Such penalties were rarely imposed, and the old law didn't stop Nevadans from approving the use of medical marijuana in 2000. State legislators in 2001 also passed a law making possession of less than an ounce a misdemeanor. The proposed ballot question would ask Nevadans if they want to allow possession of up to 3 ounces of marijuana. If approved this year and again in 2004 by voters, Nevada would have one of the most relaxed marijuana laws in the nation. It still would be illegal for minors to possess the drug, and driving under the influence laws would still apply. It also still would be illegal to use marijuana in public places. A distribution system would be set up to provide low-cost medical marijuana. __________________________________________________________________________ Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. - --- MAP posted-by: Van Estes ** web: http://www.crrh.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 12:37:52 -0700 Subject:DPFCA: SF: July 10th MMJ Rally Up TOC From: Steph Sherer <stephsherer@cannabisaction.net> RAVE/RALLY FOR SAFE ACCESS TO MEDICAL MARIJUANA Wednesday, July 10, 2 pm SF Federal Building - 450 Golden Gate Ave. Come join ASA in a rally outside of Ed Rosenthal's hearing in support of safe access. Ed was arrested during DEA Chief Asa Hutchinson's February visit to SF, as part of a show of force after the Bush Administration equated fighting terrorism with fighting the war on drugs. Come show your support for medical marijuana patients' access, and dance with us! Steph Sherer Executive Director Cannabis Action Network www.cannabisaction.net and Americans for Safe Access www.safeaccessnow.org 1678 Shattuck Ave. #317 Berkeley, CA 94709 phone: 510-486-8083 fax: 510-486-8090 ** web: http://www.crrh.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 16:15:25 -0700 Subject:DC: Washington Won't Give Up On Medical Marijuana Up TOC Newshawk: Krissy www.mpp.org Pubdate: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 Source: Associated Press (Wire) Copyright: 2002 Associated Press Author: Associated Press Cited: Marijuana Policy Project (www.mpp.org) WASHINGTON WON'T GIVE UP ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA WASHINGTON - A medical marijuana initiative could be on the District's November ballot. Supporters of the measure say they've collected about 39,000 signatures from District residents. That's more than double the 17,000 required to put the measure on the ballot. Members of the Marijuana Policy Project plan submitted the petitions to the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics this afternoon. MPP spokesman Bruce Mirken said putting the initiative before the voters is another step toward giving District residents with serious illnesses another tool to help them manage their pain. Robert Kampia of the MPP said he expects the measure to pass easily in November. It's similar to one approved by voters in 1998 which would have allowed people suffering from serious diseases like cancer, glaucoma, and AIDS to keep up to one ounce of marijuana or four live plants for medical purposes. That measure was backed by 69 percent of the voters but members of Congress blocked it from taking effect. Mirken said some members of Congress could attempt to block implementation of any medical marijuana law in the District even before voters go to the polls. __________________________________________________________________________ Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth ** web: http://www.crrh.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:51:15 -0700 Subject:UK: Britain To Go Easy On Pot Use Up TOC Newshawk: The War on Drugs IS Terrorism Pubdate: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 Source: Detroit Free Press (MI) Contact: letters@freepress.com Copyright: 2002 Detroit Free Press Website: http://www.freep.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/125 Author: Kate Kelland, Reuters Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?207 (Cannabis - United Kingdom) BRITAIN TO GO EASY ON POT USE LONDON -- Britain will respond this week to a surge in cannabis use by easing laws and allowing marijuana users to smoke without fear of arrest. Pressure from police, medical experts and politicians for Britain to take a less punitive approach has swayed Home Secretary David Blunkett, who is expected to downgrade marijuana today to a low-risk category of drug. The downgrade would make possessing small amounts of marijuana or smoking it in private a nonarrestable offense. A report published in 2001 showed cannabis was the most commonly used illicit drug in the European Union, with at least one in 10 adults in the 15-nation group having used it. Blunkett is also expected to stress that the drug will not be legalized and announce plans to double the maximum sentence for dealing to 10 years. Researchers say that relaxing cannabis laws could save Britain around $77 million a year and free up 500 police officers. In Nevada: Voters will decide in November whether to let aduults legally possess up to 3 ounces of pot, officials said Tuesday. Under the proposal, marijuana would be sold in state-licensed shops and taxed like cigarettes and other tobacco products. To become law, the change needs voter approval this year and in 2004. Whether it could actually take effect is unclear. Federal law bans marijuana possession. __________________________________________________________________________ Distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. - --- MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk CRRH is working to regulate and tax the sale of cannabis to adults like alcohol, allow doctors to recommend cannabis through pharmacies and restore the unregulated production of industrial hemp. *Campaign for the Restoration and Regulation of Hemp* mail: CRRH ; P.O. Box 86741 ; Portland, OR 97286 USA email: crrh@crrh.org phone: (503) 235-4606 fax: (503) 235-0120 web: http://www.crrh.org/ ------------------------------ End of Restore-Digest V2002 #129 ******************************** Restore Hemp News Today Visit our sister site crrh.org
Donations to THC-Foundation are tax deductible on your federal income tax, since we have been approved as a 501(c)(3) by the IRS for over 2 years. This means that your donations to THCF will lower the amount of taxable income you must pay federal taxes on, lowering your tax bill. If you can volunteer or help in any way, please let
us know. Thank you for coming! ©2002 THC Foundation Last updated:
Wednesday, November 20, 2002
|
